Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wayne Resper v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    Wayne Resper appealed the district court's denial of his motions for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding against the State of Maryland and several sergeants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings for the reasons stated. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately addressed in the materials, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Resper's motions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-08-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6357

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Wayne Resper appealed the district court's denial of his motions for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding against the State of Maryland and several sergeants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings for the reasons stated. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately addressed in the materials, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Resper's motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views2 pages

    Wayne Resper v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wayne Resper appealed the district court's denial of his motions for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding against the State of Maryland and several sergeants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings for the reasons stated. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately addressed in the materials, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Resper's motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6357

    WAYNE RESPER,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF MARYLAND; T. SIRES, Sergeant; SAWYER, Sergeant;
    DETRICK, Sergeant,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
    Judge. (8:13-cv-03717-PJM)

    Submitted:

    August 20, 2015

    Decided:

    August 24, 2015

    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wayne Resper, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wayne Resper appeals the district courts orders denying
    relief

    on

    his

    motions

    for

    1983 (2012) proceeding.


    no reversible error.
    stated

    by

    the

    reconsideration

    in

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    district

    court.

    Resper v.

    Maryland,

    No.

    8:13-cv-03717-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 3, 2014; filed Feb. 12, 2015 and
    entered Feb. 13, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like