Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Derek Jarvis v. The Christmas Attic, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Derek Jarvis's motion to file a second amended complaint against The Christmas Attic. The Court of Appeals had previously affirmed the dismissal of Jarvis's original complaint. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the time period to file an amended complaint had expired once the original complaint was dismissed. Therefore, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Jarvis's motion to file a second amended complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1103

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Derek Jarvis's motion to file a second amended complaint against The Christmas Attic. The Court of Appeals had previously affirmed the dismissal of Jarvis's original complaint. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the time period to file an amended complaint had expired once the original complaint was dismissed. Therefore, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Jarvis's motion to file a second amended complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Derek Jarvis v. The Christmas Attic, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Derek Jarvis's motion to file a second amended complaint against The Christmas Attic. The Court of Appeals had previously affirmed the dismissal of Jarvis's original complaint. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the time period to file an amended complaint had expired once the original complaint was dismissed. Therefore, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Jarvis's motion to file a second amended complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1103

    DEREK N. JARVIS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    THE CHRISTMAS ATTIC,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:12-cv-01010-CMH-TRJ)

    Submitted:

    April 24, 2014

    Decided:

    April 29, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se.


    Victor M. Glasberg, VICTOR
    M. GLASBERG & ASSOCIATES, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district courts January
    17, 2014, order denying his motion to file a second amended
    complaint.

    Because we affirmed the dismissal of his previous

    complaint, the time period for filing an amended complaint had


    expired.
    We

    deny

    See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a).


    Jarvis

    motion

    to

    proceed

    Accordingly, we affirm.
    in

    forma

    pauperis,

    deny

    Appellees motion to designate Jarvis as a vexatious litigant,


    and dispense
    contentions

    with
    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like