Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Tarik Coefield, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a motion by Tarik Coefield to appoint counsel to assist with filing a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's denial of Coefield's motion for appointment of counsel. The court also denied Coefield's motion seeking additional time to explain why counsel should be appointed and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-09-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7112

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a motion by Tarik Coefield to appoint counsel to assist with filing a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's denial of Coefield's motion for appointment of counsel. The court also denied Coefield's motion seeking additional time to explain why counsel should be appointed and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Tarik Coefield, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a motion by Tarik Coefield to appoint counsel to assist with filing a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's denial of Coefield's motion for appointment of counsel. The court also denied Coefield's motion seeking additional time to explain why counsel should be appointed and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7112

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    TARIK COEFIELD,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:93-cr-00339-LMB-1)

    Submitted:

    September 25, 2014

    Decided:

    September 30, 2014

    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tarik Coefield, Appellant Pro Se.


    Gene Rossi, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Tarik Coefield seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion to appoint counsel to aid him in filing
    a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2012).
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United States v. Coefield, No. 1:93-cr-00339-LMB-1 (E.D.

    Va. July 10, 2014).

    We deny Coefields motion to extend time to

    explain why counsel should be appointed.


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    We also dispense with


    legal
    before

    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like