Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Scott, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a motion for relief filed by James Alexander Scott under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court denied Scott's motion for relief. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-05-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6083

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a motion for relief filed by James Alexander Scott under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court denied Scott's motion for relief. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Scott, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a motion for relief filed by James Alexander Scott under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court denied Scott's motion for relief. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6083

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JAMES ALEXANDER SCOTT,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Albert V. Bryan, Jr.,
    Senior District Judge. (1:99-cr-00405-1)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2009

    Decided:

    May 28, 2009

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Alexander Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James
    order

    denying

    motion.
    error.

    Alexander
    relief

    his

    appeals
    18

    the

    U.S.C.

    district

    courts

    3582(c)(2)

    (2006)

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.
    (E.D.

    on

    Scott

    Va.

    dispense

    filed
    with

    United States v. Scott, No. 1:99-cr-00405-1


    Jan.
    oral

    5,

    2009

    argument

    &

    entered

    because

    Jan.

    the

    7,

    facts

    2009).
    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like