Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Alexander, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Corey Eugene Alexander's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had denied the motion for reasons stated in United States v. Alexander, No. 3:01-cr-00216-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2009). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-09-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7170

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Corey Eugene Alexander's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had denied the motion for reasons stated in United States v. Alexander, No. 3:01-cr-00216-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2009). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Alexander, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Corey Eugene Alexander's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The district court had denied the motion for reasons stated in United States v. Alexander, No. 3:01-cr-00216-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2009). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7170

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    COREY EUGENE ALEXANDER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K, Reidinger,
    District Judge. (3:01-cr-00216-MR-1)

    Submitted:

    September 10, 2009

    Decided:

    September 16, 2009

    Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Corey Eugene Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Corey

    Eugene

    Alexander

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a


    sentence reduction.
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    00216-MR-1

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    (W.D.N.C.

    United States v. Alexander, No. 3:01-crJune

    11,

    2009).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like