Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Maxwell v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion for modification and reduction of his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel of three judges dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The unpublished opinion from the Court of Appeals is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6193

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion for modification and reduction of his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel of three judges dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The unpublished opinion from the Court of Appeals is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Maxwell v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion for modification and reduction of his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel of three judges dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The unpublished opinion from the Court of Appeals is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6193

    LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, SR.,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-93-262-A)

    Submitted:

    March 20, 2003

    Decided:

    March 31, 2003

    Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for modification and reduction of his sentence.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Maxwell v. United States, No. CR-93-262-A (E.D. Va.

    Jan. 13, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like