Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Braxton v. Young, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from David A. Braxton, Jr. seeking relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The court reviewed Braxton's case and the district court's denial of relief and found no reversible error. As such, the court denied a certificate of appealability, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6399

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from David A. Braxton, Jr. seeking relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The court reviewed Braxton's case and the district court's denial of relief and found no reversible error. As such, the court denied a certificate of appealability, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Braxton v. Young, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from David A. Braxton, Jr. seeking relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The court reviewed Braxton's case and the district court's denial of relief and found no reversible error. As such, the court denied a certificate of appealability, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6399

    DAVID A. BRAXTON, JR.,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    S. K. YOUNG, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (CA-01-1595-AM)

    Submitted:

    April 5, 2002

    Decided:

    April 23, 2002

    Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    David A. Braxton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    David A. Braxton, Jr., seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254
    (West 1994 & Supp. 2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the

    district courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,


    we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in
    forma pauperis on appeal, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court.

    See Braxton v. Young, No. CA-01-1595-AM

    (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 8, 2002; entered Feb. 11, 2002).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like