Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Fruetel v. United States, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Patricia Rae Fruetel appealed the district court's denial of her petition to modify the terms of her supervised release. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Fruetel's petition based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-05-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6023

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Patricia Rae Fruetel appealed the district court's denial of her petition to modify the terms of her supervised release. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Fruetel's petition based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Fruetel v. United States, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Patricia Rae Fruetel appealed the district court's denial of her petition to modify the terms of her supervised release. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Fruetel's petition based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6023

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Respondent - Appellee,
    versus
    PATRICIA RAE FRUETEL,
    Petitioner - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-91-70)

    Submitted:

    April 29, 2002

    Decided:

    May 20, 2002

    Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Patricia Rae Fruetel, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Patricia

    Rae

    Fruetel

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying her petition to modify the terms of her supervised release


    pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. 3583(e)(1) (West 2000). We have reviewed
    the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    United States v. Fruetel, No. CR-91-70 (E.D. Va. Nov. 26,

    2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like