Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Powell, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Charlie Wade Powell's motion for modification of his sentence. Powell had filed the motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows for reduction of sentences under certain circumstances. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Powell's motion. The appellate court thus affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-11-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7289

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Charlie Wade Powell's motion for modification of his sentence. Powell had filed the motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows for reduction of sentences under certain circumstances. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Powell's motion. The appellate court thus affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Powell, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Charlie Wade Powell's motion for modification of his sentence. Powell had filed the motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows for reduction of sentences under certain circumstances. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Powell's motion. The appellate court thus affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7289

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CHARLIE WADE POWELL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (CR-88-193)

    Submitted:

    November 8, 2001

    Decided:

    November 16, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charlie Wade Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charlie Wade Powell appeals the district courts order denying
    his

    motion

    for

    modification

    3582(c)(2) (West 2000).

    of

    sentence

    under

    18

    U.S.C.A.

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
    on the reasoning of the district court.
    No. CR-88-193 (M.D.N.C. July 23, 2001).

    Accordingly, we affirm
    United States v. Powell,
    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like