Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gayle, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Enrique Alfonso Gayle's motion under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in existing court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6896

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Enrique Alfonso Gayle's motion under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Gayle, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Enrique Alfonso Gayle's motion under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6896

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ENRIQUE ALFONSO GAYLE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (2:90-cr-00105-HCM)

    Submitted:

    October 11, 2007

    Decided:

    October 17, 2007

    Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Enrique Alfonso Gayle, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Enrique Alfonso Gayle appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) (1985).
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United

    States v. Gayle, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM (E.D. Va. filed May 24,


    2007; entered May 25, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like