Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Clarence Dukes v. Richard Wilson, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    25 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Clarence Dukes in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Richard Wilson. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials. The Court affirmed the district court's denial of Dukes' complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-11-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6910

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Clarence Dukes in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Richard Wilson. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials. The Court affirmed the district court's denial of Dukes' complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    25 views2 pages

    Clarence Dukes v. Richard Wilson, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Clarence Dukes in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Richard Wilson. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials. The Court affirmed the district court's denial of Dukes' complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6910

    CLARENCE DUKES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    RICHARD WILSON, Business Manager,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Norman K. Moon, Senior
    District Judge. (7:11-cv-00530-NKM-RSB)

    Submitted:

    October 28, 2013

    Decided:

    November 5, 2013

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Clarence Dukes, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs Todd, OFFICE
    OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Clarence

    Dukes

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Dukes v. Wilson, No. 7:11-cv-00530-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va.

    August 28, 2012; May 21, 2013).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like