Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nicholas Queen, Sr. v. Warden, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Nicholas James Queen, Sr. appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As a result, the court denied Queen's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasons provided by the district court in its denial of the petition. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-10-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7484

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Nicholas James Queen, Sr. appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As a result, the court denied Queen's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasons provided by the district court in its denial of the petition. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Nicholas Queen, Sr. v. Warden, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Nicholas James Queen, Sr. appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. As a result, the court denied Queen's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasons provided by the district court in its denial of the petition. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7484

    NICHOLAS JAMES QUEEN, SR.,


    Petitioner Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William M. Nickerson, Senior District
    Judge. (1:12-cv-02257-WMN)

    Submitted:

    October 17, 2012

    Decided:

    October 31, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Nicholas James Queen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Nicholas

    James

    Queen,

    Sr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts order denying his petition for writ of mandamus.


    have

    reviewed

    Accordingly,

    we

    the
    deny

    record
    leave

    and
    to

    find

    no

    proceed

    in

    reversible
    forma

    We

    error.

    pauperis

    and

    dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
    Queen v. Warden, No. 1:12-cv-02257-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 24, 2012).
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like