Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kerry Nixon v. James Rector, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Kerry Lee Nixon appealed a district court's dismissal of his Title VII complaint against James Rector and Oceana Commissary Store. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and concurred with the district court's dismissal of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-1947

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kerry Lee Nixon appealed a district court's dismissal of his Title VII complaint against James Rector and Oceana Commissary Store. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and concurred with the district court's dismissal of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Kerry Nixon v. James Rector, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kerry Lee Nixon appealed a district court's dismissal of his Title VII complaint against James Rector and Oceana Commissary Store. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and concurred with the district court's dismissal of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-1947

    KERRY LEE NIXON,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    JAMES RECTOR; OCEANA COMMISSARY STORE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
    Judge. (2:12-cv-00334-AWA-FBS)

    Submitted:

    November 13, 2012

    Decided: November 15, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kerry Lee Nixon, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kerry

    Lee

    Nixon

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) (2006) his complaint filed


    pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Nixon v. Rector,

    No. 2:12-cv-00334-AWA-FBS (E.D. Va. July 23, 2012).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like