Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Huggins V., 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Brian Huggins filed a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to require the United States to respond to his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The court of appeals noted that the district court had already ordered the United States to respond on March 27, 2002, giving Huggins the relief he sought. Therefore, the court dismissed the mandamus petition as moot and denied Huggins' motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6532

    Original Title

    In re: Huggins v., 4th Cir. (2002)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Brian Huggins filed a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to require the United States to respond to his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The court of appeals noted that the district court had already ordered the United States to respond on March 27, 2002, giving Huggins the relief he sought. Therefore, the court dismissed the mandamus petition as moot and denied Huggins' motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    In Re: Huggins V., 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Brian Huggins filed a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to require the United States to respond to his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The court of appeals noted that the district court had already ordered the United States to respond on March 27, 2002, giving Huggins the relief he sought. Therefore, the court dismissed the mandamus petition as moot and denied Huggins' motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6532

    In Re:

    BRIAN TIMOTHY HUGGINS,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    April 17, 2002

    (CA-01-4527)

    Decided:

    April 29, 2002

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Brian Timothy Huggins, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Brian Timothy Huggins petitions this court for a writ of
    mandamus directing the district court to require the United States
    to respond to his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion,
    which Huggins filed in November 2001.

    The district court docket

    sheet reveals that on March 27, 2002, the district court ordered
    the United States to respond.
    the relief he seeks.

    Accordingly, Huggins has received

    We deny the motion for leave to proceed in

    forma pauperis and dismiss the mandamus petition as moot.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DISMISSED

    You might also like