Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jameel Mateen v. Ed Murray L.B. Cie: H.L. Underwood, 816 F.2d 672, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1987. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to the plaintiff, Jameel Mateen, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues recently decided in other cases. The court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no need to further explain based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its December 22, 1986 decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-04-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 816 F.2d 672 Docket: 87-7029

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1987. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to the plaintiff, Jameel Mateen, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues recently decided in other cases. The court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no need to further explain based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its December 22, 1986 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Jameel Mateen v. Ed Murray L.B. Cie: H.L. Underwood, 816 F.2d 672, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1987. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to the plaintiff, Jameel Mateen, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues recently decided in other cases. The court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no need to further explain based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its December 22, 1986 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    816 F.

    2d 672
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Jameel MATEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Ed MURRAY; L.B. Cie: H.L. Underwood, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 87-7029.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 27, 1987.
    Decided April 7, 1987.

    Before HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Jameel Mateen, appellant pro se.
    Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the district court. Mateen v. Murray, C/A No. 86-548 (W.D.Va., Dec. 22,
    1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like