Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Earnest Lee Deboise v. A.K. Pruitt D.W. Ashley W.Y. Mitchell, 819 F.2d 1137, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    The court reviewed a case in which Earnest Lee DeBoise filed a pro se appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. In a per curiam opinion, the court found the appeal to be without merit. While allowing DeBoise to proceed in forma pauperis, the court dispensed with oral argument because the issues had been recently decided by authoritative opinions. The court affirmed the district court's judgment based on the reasoning provided in DeBoise v. Pruitt, C/A No. 86-1316-CRT (E.D.N.C., Jan. 20, 1987).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-05-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 819 F.2d 1137 Docket: 87-6548

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The court reviewed a case in which Earnest Lee DeBoise filed a pro se appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. In a per curiam opinion, the court found the appeal to be without merit. While allowing DeBoise to proceed in forma pauperis, the court dispensed with oral argument because the issues had been recently decided by authoritative opinions. The court affirmed the district court's judgment based on the reasoning provided in DeBoise v. Pruitt, C/A No. 86-1316-CRT (E.D.N.C., Jan. 20, 1987).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Earnest Lee Deboise v. A.K. Pruitt D.W. Ashley W.Y. Mitchell, 819 F.2d 1137, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The court reviewed a case in which Earnest Lee DeBoise filed a pro se appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. In a per curiam opinion, the court found the appeal to be without merit. While allowing DeBoise to proceed in forma pauperis, the court dispensed with oral argument because the issues had been recently decided by authoritative opinions. The court affirmed the district court's judgment based on the reasoning provided in DeBoise v. Pruitt, C/A No. 86-1316-CRT (E.D.N.C., Jan. 20, 1987).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    819 F.

    2d 1137
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Earnest Lee DEBOISE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    A.K. PRUITT; D.W. Ashley; W.Y. Mitchell, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 87-6548.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 17, 1987.
    Decided May 19, 1987.

    Before PHILLIPS, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.


    Earnest Lee DeBoise, appellant pro se.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral
    argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided
    authoritatively. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the district court. DeBoise v. Pruitt, C/A No. 86-1316-CRT (E.D.N.C., Jan. 20,
    1987).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like