Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • LeGrande v. Hogewood, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Guy T. LeGrande, a North Carolina inmate, filed a Section 1983 complaint that was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. LeGrande appealed the district court's decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found LeGrande's appeal to be frivolous. As such, the court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the Section 1983 complaint. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-08-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6732

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Guy T. LeGrande, a North Carolina inmate, filed a Section 1983 complaint that was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. LeGrande appealed the district court's decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found LeGrande's appeal to be frivolous. As such, the court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the Section 1983 complaint. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    LeGrande v. Hogewood, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Guy T. LeGrande, a North Carolina inmate, filed a Section 1983 complaint that was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. LeGrande appealed the district court's decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found LeGrande's appeal to be frivolous. As such, the court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the Section 1983 complaint. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6732

    GUY T. LEGRANDE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ANNE NICHOLSON HOGEWOOD,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-334-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    July 30, 1998

    Decided:

    August 27, 1998

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Guy T. LeGrande, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have
    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find that
    this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court. LeGrande v. Hogewood, No. CA-98334-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like