Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Taylor v. Woodard, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Thomas Herbert Taylor filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7688

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Thomas Herbert Taylor filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Taylor v. Woodard, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Thomas Herbert Taylor filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7688

    THOMAS HERBERT TAYLOR,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    G. L. WOODARD,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-98-419-5-H)

    Submitted:

    March 25, 1999

    Decided:

    March 31, 1999

    Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Thomas Herbert Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas Herbert Taylor seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Woodard, No. CA-98419-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like