Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jackson v. Poplin, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    Samuel Jackson appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Jackson's pending motions to appoint counsel and amend his complaint, determining that oral argument was not necessary as the legal issues and arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-09-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6441

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Samuel Jackson appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Jackson's pending motions to appoint counsel and amend his complaint, determining that oral argument was not necessary as the legal issues and arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views2 pages

    Jackson v. Poplin, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Samuel Jackson appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Jackson's pending motions to appoint counsel and amend his complaint, determining that oral argument was not necessary as the legal issues and arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6441

    SAMUEL R. JACKSON,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    H. POPLIN, Programmer, Lanesboro Correctional Institution;
    S. HOVERMALE, Kitchen Supervisor, Lanesboro Correctional
    Institution; SGT. R. NICHOLSON; SGT. D. LENTZ,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00107-GCM)

    Submitted:

    August 26, 2010

    Decided:

    September 2, 2010

    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Samuel R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Samuel R. Jackson appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to
    state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006).
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Jackson

    v.

    Poplin,

    Mar. 12,

    2010).

    We

    also

    No.

    deny

    3:10-cv-00107-GCM

    Jacksons

    pending

    appoint counsel and to amend his complaint.


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    (W.D.N.C.
    motions

    to

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like