Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Curtis Shuler v. Richard Neely, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Curtis D. Shuler appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Shuler v. Neely, No. 3:11-cv-00182-RJC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2011), concluding that there was no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-08-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6592

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Curtis D. Shuler appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Shuler v. Neely, No. 3:11-cv-00182-RJC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2011), concluding that there was no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Curtis Shuler v. Richard Neely, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Curtis D. Shuler appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Shuler v. Neely, No. 3:11-cv-00182-RJC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2011), concluding that there was no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6592

    CURTIS D. SHULER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    RICHARD
    NEELY,
    Superintendent,
    Lanesboro
    Correctional
    Institution; C. W. CLARK, Supervisor, Food Management,
    Lanesboro Correctional Institution; J. BENNETT, Supervisor,
    Programs, Lanesboro Correctional Institution,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Robert J. Conrad,
    Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00182-RJC)

    Submitted:

    August 25, 2011

    Decided:

    August 30, 2011

    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Curtis D. Shuler, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Curtis D. Shuler appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915A(b) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and conclude

    there is no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    See Shuler v. Neely, No.

    3:11-cv-00182-RJC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2011).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like