Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stanfill v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Charles Stanfill of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. The appeals court thus denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6831

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Charles Stanfill of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. The appeals court thus denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Stanfill v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Charles Stanfill of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny relief. The appeals court thus denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6831

    CHARLES STANFILL,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL MOORE, Director, SCDC; CHARLES M.
    CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South
    Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (CA-96-2231)
    Submitted:

    September 11, 1997

    Decided:

    September 23, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Charles Stanfill, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
    Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. Stanfill v. Moore, No. CA-96-2231 (D.S.C. May 23, 1997). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like