Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Zulu X v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Shaka Macumba Zulu X, who sought to appeal the district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit therefore denied a certificate of appealability, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-10-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6572

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Shaka Macumba Zulu X, who sought to appeal the district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit therefore denied a certificate of appealability, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Zulu X v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Shaka Macumba Zulu X, who sought to appeal the district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit therefore denied a certificate of appealability, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6572

    SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X, a/k/a Thomas E. Howard,


    a/k/a Michael Wayne Montgomery,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director of South Carolina
    Department of Corrections; STATE OF SOUTH
    CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General
    of the State of South Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-97-987-4-13BE)
    Submitted:

    October 10, 1997

    Decided:

    October 28, 1997

    Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis,
    and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Zulu
    X v. Moore, No. CA-97-987-4-13BE (D.S.C. Apr. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like