Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Banks, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Pamela Banks appealed the district court's denial of her motion to reduce her sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that Banks was not entitled to a sentence reduction. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-11-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7074

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Pamela Banks appealed the district court's denial of her motion to reduce her sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that Banks was not entitled to a sentence reduction. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Banks, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Pamela Banks appealed the district court's denial of her motion to reduce her sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing that Banks was not entitled to a sentence reduction. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7074

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    PAMELA L. BANKS,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (2:05-cr-00131-RAJ-FBS-2)

    Submitted:

    October 23, 2008

    Decided:

    November 17, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Pamela L. Banks,
    Assistant
    United
    Appellee.

    Appellant Pro Se.


    William David Muhr,
    States
    Attorney,
    Norfolk,
    Virginia,
    for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Pamela

    L.

    Banks

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying her motion to reduce her sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.


    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Banks, No. 2:05-cr-

    00131-RAJ-FBS-2 (E.D. Va. May 13, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like