Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Boynton, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of David Boynton's motion to reduce his sentence. The district court had denied the motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c), which governs reductions of sentences. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8322

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of David Boynton's motion to reduce his sentence. The district court had denied the motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c), which governs reductions of sentences. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Boynton, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of David Boynton's motion to reduce his sentence. The district court had denied the motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c), which governs reductions of sentences. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8322

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    DAVID BOYNTON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:97-cr-00294-JRS-1)

    Submitted:

    February 19, 2009

    Decided:

    February 26, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Amy Leigh


    Austin, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Assistant Federal
    Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.
    Richard
    Daniel Cooke, Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States
    Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David
    denying

    his

    Boynton

    motion

    for

    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).


    no reversible error.

    appeals

    the

    reduction

    of

    district
    sentence

    courts
    pursuant

    order
    to

    18

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm.

    United States v.

    Boynton, No. 3:97-cr-00294-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 2008).

    See

    United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like