Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Bacon, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Brian Bacon appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit affirmed both rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and cited two prior rulings that supported the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit declined to hold oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-04-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7907

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Brian Bacon appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit affirmed both rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and cited two prior rulings that supported the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit declined to hold oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Bacon, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Brian Bacon appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit affirmed both rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and cited two prior rulings that supported the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit declined to hold oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7907

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    BRIAN BACON, a/k/a Brian Hillard,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    James C. Turk, Senior
    District Judge. (7:95-cr-00028-jct-1)

    Submitted:

    April 23, 2009

    Decided:

    April 30, 2009

    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Brian Bacon, Appellant Pro Se.


    Ray Burton Fitzgerald, Jr.,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ronald Mitchell Huber,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia;
    Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Brian
    denying

    relief

    3582(c)(2)

    Bacon
    on

    appeals

    his

    (2006),

    the

    and

    motion

    filed

    denying

    district

    courts

    pursuant

    to

    18

    reconsideration.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    orders
    U.S.C.
    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United

    States v. Bacon, No. 7:95-cr-00028-jct-1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 2008;


    Aug. 19, 2008); see United States v. Lindsey, 556 F.3d 238, 24345 (4th Cir. 2009); United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251
    (4th Cir. 2009).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like