Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Steve Wool's complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. As the issues had been recently decided by authoritative precedent, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-01-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 836 F.2d 1343 Docket: 87-3762

    Original Title

    Steve Wool v. Alan Horwitz, Irwin Weiss, Beats Z. Fefel, Riggleman Reporting Service, John Austin, C. MacNair Speed, Lord & Whip, Government Employees Insurance Company & Affiliates, Attorney Grievance Commission, State of Maryland, Defendants, 836 F.2d 1343, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Steve Wool's complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. As the issues had been recently decided by authoritative precedent, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Steve Wool's complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. As the issues had been recently decided by authoritative precedent, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    836 F.

    2d 1343
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Steve WOOL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Alan Horwitz, Irwin Weiss, Beats Z. Fefel, Riggleman
    Reporting Service, John Austin, C. Macnair Speed, Lord &
    Whip, Government Employees Insurance Company &
    Affiliates,
    Attorney Grievance Commission, State of Maryland,
    Defendants- Appellees.
    No. 87-3762.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 25, 1987.
    Decided Jan. 7, 1988.

    Steve Wool, appellant pro se.


    Before DONALD RUSSELL, JAMES PHILLIPS, and WILKINS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order dismissing plaintiff's complaint for lack of jurisdiction is without
    merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively,
    we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the
    reasoning of the district court. Wool v. Horowitz, C/A No. 87-709 (D.Md. Sept.
    16, 1987).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like