Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McQuinn v. Boone, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Atarah McQuinn filed a pro se complaint against David E. Boone under Bivens. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court in its previous dismissal. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-06-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7747

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Atarah McQuinn filed a pro se complaint against David E. Boone under Bivens. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court in its previous dismissal. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    McQuinn v. Boone, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Atarah McQuinn filed a pro se complaint against David E. Boone under Bivens. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court in its previous dismissal. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7747

    ATARAH MCQUINN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DAVID E. BOONE, Esq.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:07-cv-00465-REP)

    Submitted:

    May 29, 2008

    Decided:

    June 4, 2008

    Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Atarah McQuinn, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Atarah

    McQuinn

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) her complaint


    filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau
    of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the

    appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

    McQuinn v.

    Boone, No. 3:07-cv-00465-REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2007). We dispense


    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like