Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. McQuinn, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Atarah McQuinn appealed a district court's denial of her motion to modify her term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-07-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6674

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Atarah McQuinn appealed a district court's denial of her motion to modify her term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. McQuinn, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Atarah McQuinn appealed a district court's denial of her motion to modify her term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6674

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ATARAH MCQUINN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, District
    Judge. (3:02-cr-00095-REP)

    Submitted: July 24, 2007

    Decided:

    July 31, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Atarah McQuinn, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Atarah McQuinn appeals the district courts order denying
    McQuinns motion to modify her term of imprisonment pursuant to 18
    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find

    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    by the district court.

    See United States v. McQuinn, No. 3:02-cr-

    00095-REP (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like