Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Sanjurjo, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Benjamin Sanjurjo's motion to reduce his sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Per curiam, the unpublished opinion states that the facts and legal arguments are adequately explained in the lower court materials so oral arguments are not necessary. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Sanjurjo's request to reduce his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-07-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6600

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Benjamin Sanjurjo's motion to reduce his sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Per curiam, the unpublished opinion states that the facts and legal arguments are adequately explained in the lower court materials so oral arguments are not necessary. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Sanjurjo's request to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Sanjurjo, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Benjamin Sanjurjo's motion to reduce his sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Per curiam, the unpublished opinion states that the facts and legal arguments are adequately explained in the lower court materials so oral arguments are not necessary. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Sanjurjo's request to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6600

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    BENJAMIN SANJURJO,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (3:98-cr-00338-RLW-2)

    Submitted:

    July 23, 2009

    Decided:

    July 30, 2009

    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Benjamin Sanjurjo, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephen Wiley Miller,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Benjamin Sanjurjo appeals the district courts order
    denying his U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction of
    sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Sanjurjo, No. 3:98-cr-00338-

    RLW-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like