Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Braxton, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Savino Braxton's motion for reduction of sentence. Braxton appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7151

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Savino Braxton's motion for reduction of sentence. Braxton appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views2 pages

    United States v. Braxton, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Savino Braxton's motion for reduction of sentence. Braxton appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7151

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    SAVINO BRAXTON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
    (CR-90-135-JFM)

    Submitted:

    August 23, 2001

    Decided:

    September 5, 2001

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Savino Braxton appeals the district courts order denying his
    motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. 3582(c)(2)
    (West 2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on

    the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Braxton, No.


    CR-90-135-JFM (D. Md. June 25, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like