Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sean M. Shropshire v. E.L. Wingo, Sheriff Chesterfield County Sheriff's Department, Defendants, 850 F.2d 690, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views1 page
    Sean Shropshire filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 action that was dismissed by the district court for failure to pay the filing fee. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding that the district court followed the proper procedures for dismissing an action without prejudice due to non-payment of fees as outlined in an earlier Fourth Circuit case. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-06-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 850 F.2d 690 Docket: 88-6601

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Sean Shropshire filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 action that was dismissed by the district court for failure to pay the filing fee. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding that the district court followed the proper procedures for dismissing an action without prejudice due to non-payment of fees as outlined in an earlier Fourth Circuit case. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views1 page

    Sean M. Shropshire v. E.L. Wingo, Sheriff Chesterfield County Sheriff's Department, Defendants, 850 F.2d 690, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sean Shropshire filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 action that was dismissed by the district court for failure to pay the filing fee. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding that the district court followed the proper procedures for dismissing an action without prejudice due to non-payment of fees as outlined in an earlier Fourth Circuit case. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    850 F.

    2d 690
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Sean M. SHROPSHIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    E.L. WINGO, Sheriff; Chesterfield County Sheriff's
    Department, Defendants- Appellees.
    No. 88-6601.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 17, 1988.
    Decided: June 16, 1988.

    Sean M. Shropshire, appellant pro se.


    Before K.K. HALL, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Sean M. Shropshire appeals the district court's dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. Sec.
    1983 action for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. Finding that the district
    court properly complied with the procedures approved in Evans v. Croom, 650
    F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and did not abuse
    its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice, we affirm the district
    court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral
    argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like