Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Page v. Murray, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Terry O'Connor Page. The court had reviewed Page's Rule 60(b)(3) motion and the district court's denial of that motion. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the case based on the district court's prior opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7725

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Terry O'Connor Page. The court had reviewed Page's Rule 60(b)(3) motion and the district court's denial of that motion. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the case based on the district court's prior opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Page v. Murray, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Terry O'Connor Page. The court had reviewed Page's Rule 60(b)(3) motion and the district court's denial of that motion. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the case based on the district court's prior opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 96-7725

    TERRY O'CONNOR PAGE,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    EDWARD MURRAY, Director,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
    (CA-94-12)
    Submitted:

    May 29, 1997

    Decided:

    June 5, 1997

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Terry O'Connor Page, Appellant Pro Se. Robert B. Condon, Assistant
    Attorney General, Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on
    the reasoning of the district court. Page v. Murray, No. CA-94-12
    (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like