Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Edward Ouma, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case where Edward Ouma appealed a district court's denial of his motions to reconsider, for writ of coram nobis, and for appointment of counsel related to a 1998 criminal case. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court in its denial of Ouma's motions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-09-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6915

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case where Edward Ouma appealed a district court's denial of his motions to reconsider, for writ of coram nobis, and for appointment of counsel related to a 1998 criminal case. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court in its denial of Ouma's motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Edward Ouma, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case where Edward Ouma appealed a district court's denial of his motions to reconsider, for writ of coram nobis, and for appointment of counsel related to a 1998 criminal case. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court in its denial of Ouma's motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6915

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EDWARD OUMA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-98-252)

    Submitted:

    September 8, 1999

    Decided:

    September 24, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Edward Ouma, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United
    States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward Ouma appeals the district courts order denying Oumas
    motions to reconsider, for writ of coram nobis, and for appointment
    of counsel.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on

    the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Ouma,

    No. CR-98-252 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argu-

    ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like