Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Hammoude, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    Mohammed Hammoude appealed the district court's denial of his motion for early termination of supervised release. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no abuse of discretion or reversible error. The appellate court relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its January 2005 order denying Hammoude's motion. The appellate panel dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-10-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6045

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mohammed Hammoude appealed the district court's denial of his motion for early termination of supervised release. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no abuse of discretion or reversible error. The appellate court relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its January 2005 order denying Hammoude's motion. The appellate panel dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    15 views2 pages

    United States v. Hammoude, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mohammed Hammoude appealed the district court's denial of his motion for early termination of supervised release. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no abuse of discretion or reversible error. The appellate court relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its January 2005 order denying Hammoude's motion. The appellate panel dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6045

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MOHAMMED HAMMOUDE, a/k/a Mohammad Hammoudeh,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (CR-00-9-A)

    Submitted:

    October 19, 2005

    Decided:

    October 26, 2005

    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mohammed Hammoude, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Wiechering,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mohammed Hammoude appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for termination of supervised release.

    We have

    reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See United States v. Hammoude, CR-00-9-A (E.D. Va. filed

    Jan. 10, 2005; entered Jan. 12, 2005).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like