Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Hawkins, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jamal Hawkins' motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Hawkins appealed the district court's ruling, but the appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court cited the district court's reasons for denying the motion and a previous ruling in affirming the lower court's decision without requiring oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8259

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jamal Hawkins' motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Hawkins appealed the district court's ruling, but the appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court cited the district court's reasons for denying the motion and a previous ruling in affirming the lower court's decision without requiring oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Hawkins, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jamal Hawkins' motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Hawkins appealed the district court's ruling, but the appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court cited the district court's reasons for denying the motion and a previous ruling in affirming the lower court's decision without requiring oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8259

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JAMAL TIMOTHY HAWKINS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:05-cr-00497-LMB-1)

    Submitted:

    February 26, 2009

    Decided:

    March 9, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Frances H. Pratt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria,


    Virginia, for Appellant. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Assistant United
    States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jamal

    Timothy

    Hawkins

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence


    under

    18

    U.S.C.

    3582(c)(2)

    (2006).

    record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Hawkins, No. 1:05-cr-00497-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 2008); see


    United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009).
    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like