Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Hope, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Michael Anthony Hope appealed the district court's denial of his Rule 36 motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Hope's motion for the reasons stated by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-10-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6810

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Anthony Hope appealed the district court's denial of his Rule 36 motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Hope's motion for the reasons stated by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Hope, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Anthony Hope appealed the district court's denial of his Rule 36 motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Hope's motion for the reasons stated by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6810

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL ANTHONY HOPE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (3:05-cr-00522-RLW)

    Submitted:

    September 29, 2009

    Decided:

    October 2, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Anthony Hope, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Childs Ackley,


    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Anthony

    Hope

    appeals

    the

    district

    order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion.


    the record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Hope, No. 3:05-cr-00522-RLW (E.D. Va. May 2, 2008).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like