Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Chapman, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2001. It dismisses the appeal of Antonio Chapman, who sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decided oral arguments would not aid its decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6958

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2001. It dismisses the appeal of Antonio Chapman, who sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decided oral arguments would not aid its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Chapman, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2001. It dismisses the appeal of Antonio Chapman, who sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. It therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decided oral arguments would not aid its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6958

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ANTONIO MAURICE CHAPMAN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CR-98-10, CA-99-970-7)

    Submitted:

    August 9, 2001

    Decided:

    August 17, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Antonio Maurice Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge
    Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Antonio Maurice Chapman seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    See United States v. Chapman, Nos. CR-98-10;

    CA-99-970-7 (W.D. Va. May 10, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like