Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Anthony Quinn, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Allen Quinn's motion to compel the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion for sentence reduction based on substantial assistance and his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-05-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6004

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Allen Quinn's motion to compel the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion for sentence reduction based on substantial assistance and his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Anthony Quinn, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Allen Quinn's motion to compel the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion for sentence reduction based on substantial assistance and his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6004

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ANTHONY ALLEN QUINN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:01-cr-00089-LMB-1)

    Submitted:

    May 24, 2012

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    DAVIS,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    May 30, 2012

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony
    Allen
    Quinn,
    Appellant
    Pro
    Se.
    William
    Neil
    Hammerstrom, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony

    Allen

    Quinn

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders denying his motion to compel the Government to file a


    Fed. R. Crim. 35(b) motion and his motion for reconsideration.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United States v. Quinn, No. 1:01-cr-00089-LMB-1 (E.D.

    Va. Oct. 18, 2011; filed Nov. 21, 2011 & entered Nov. 22, 2011).
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like