Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. William Bobbitt, JR., 77 F.3d 467, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Robert Lee Brock filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against William Bobbitt Jr. in district court that was denied. Brock appealed the denial and the denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's rulings, denied Brock in forma pauperis status, and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 77 F.3d 467 Docket: 95-7828

    Original Title

    Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. William Bobbitt, Jr., 77 F.3d 467, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Robert Lee Brock filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against William Bobbitt Jr. in district court that was denied. Brock appealed the denial and the denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's rulings, denied Brock in forma pauperis status, and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. William Bobbitt, JR., 77 F.3d 467, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Robert Lee Brock filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against William Bobbitt Jr. in district court that was denied. Brock appealed the denial and the denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's rulings, denied Brock in forma pauperis status, and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    77 F.

    3d 467

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Robert Lee BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, PlaintiffAppellant,
    v.
    William BOBBITT, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 95-7828.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
    Decided Feb. 28, 1996.

    Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny in forma pauperis status and dismiss the appeal on
    the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Bobbitt, No. CA-95-748-2 (E.D.
    Va. July 24, 1995; Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like