Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Isaac Eugene Slappy v. Michael Moore, in His Official and Individual Capacity, 108 F.3d 1373, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    Isaac Eugene Slappy filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Michael Moore which was denied by the district court. Slappy appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 108 F.3d 1373 Docket: 96-7514

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Isaac Eugene Slappy filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Michael Moore which was denied by the district court. Slappy appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views1 page

    Isaac Eugene Slappy v. Michael Moore, in His Official and Individual Capacity, 108 F.3d 1373, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Isaac Eugene Slappy filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Michael Moore which was denied by the district court. Slappy appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    108 F.

    3d 1373

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Isaac Eugene SLAPPY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Michael MOORE, in his official and individual capacity,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-7514.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 13, 1997.
    Decided March 19, 1997.

    Isaac Eugene Slappy, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Slappy v. Moore, No. CA-96-1726-0-22BD (D.S.C. Aug. 26, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like