Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • John B. Vester v. Edward Murray, Director of The Virginia Department of Corrections, 829 F.2d 37, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1987 in which John B. Vester appealed the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief by a district court. The appeals court found that an appeal would be without merit based on issues already decided in previous cases. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying habeas corpus relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-09-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 829 F.2d 37 Docket: 87-7523

    Original Title

    John B. Vester v. Edward Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, 829 F.2d 37, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1987 in which John B. Vester appealed the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief by a district court. The appeals court found that an appeal would be without merit based on issues already decided in previous cases. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    John B. Vester v. Edward Murray, Director of The Virginia Department of Corrections, 829 F.2d 37, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1987 in which John B. Vester appealed the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief by a district court. The appeals court found that an appeal would be without merit based on issues already decided in previous cases. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause, did not hold oral arguments, and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    829 F.

    2d 37
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    John B. VESTER, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Edward MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of
    Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 87-7523

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 28, 1987.
    Decided September 2, 1987.

    John B. Vester, appellant pro se.


    Robert Homer Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia,
    for appellee.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
    magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing
    habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and
    dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Vester v. Murray, CA
    No. 86-500-N (E.D.Va., Jan. 22, 1987).

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like