Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Audie Lee Mullins v. Edward Murray Attorney General of The State of Virginia, 838 F.2d 467, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a petitioner, Audie Lee Mullins, seeking habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit finds that an appeal would be without merit based on the record and recent authoritative decisions on the dispositive issues. The court denies a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispenses with oral argument, and dismisses the appeal, relying on the reasoning of the district court's previous denial of habeas corpus relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-01-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 838 F.2d 467 Docket: 87-7653

    Original Title

    Audie Lee Mullins v. Edward Murray Attorney General of the State of Virginia, 838 F.2d 467, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a petitioner, Audie Lee Mullins, seeking habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit finds that an appeal would be without merit based on the record and recent authoritative decisions on the dispositive issues. The court denies a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispenses with oral argument, and dismisses the appeal, relying on the reasoning of the district court's previous denial of habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views1 page

    Audie Lee Mullins v. Edward Murray Attorney General of The State of Virginia, 838 F.2d 467, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a petitioner, Audie Lee Mullins, seeking habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit finds that an appeal would be without merit based on the record and recent authoritative decisions on the dispositive issues. The court denies a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispenses with oral argument, and dismisses the appeal, relying on the reasoning of the district court's previous denial of habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    838 F.

    2d 467
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Audie Lee MULLINS, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Edward MURRAY; Attorney General of the State of Virginia,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 87-7653.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Dec. 15, 1987.
    Decided: Jan. 12, 1988.

    Audie Lee Mullins, pro se.


    Robert Homer Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia,
    for appellees.
    Before CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal
    from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254
    would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been
    decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal,
    dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Mullins v. Murray, C/A No. 86-148-B (W.D.Va. July 1, 1987).

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like