Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Parker v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed John P. Parker's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Parker's petition. The appeals court also denied Parker a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 30, 1999 order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-01-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7458

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed John P. Parker's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Parker's petition. The appeals court also denied Parker a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 30, 1999 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Parker v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed John P. Parker's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Parker's petition. The appeals court also denied Parker a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 30, 1999 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7458

    JOHN P. PARKER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    (CA-98-823-2)

    Submitted:

    January 13, 2000

    Decided:

    January 20, 2000

    Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    John P. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John P. Parker seeks to appeal the district courts judgment
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts final order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate


    judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
    the district court.
    Va. Sept. 30, 1999).

    See Parker v. Angelone, No. CA-98-823-2 (E.D.


    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like