Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nasiatka v. England, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views3 pages
    Michael Nasiatka filed an employment discrimination action against the Department of the Navy. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Navy. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-04-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1444

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Nasiatka filed an employment discrimination action against the Department of the Navy. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Navy. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    15 views3 pages

    Nasiatka v. England, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Nasiatka filed an employment discrimination action against the Department of the Navy. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Navy. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1444

    MICHAEL P. NASIATKA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GORDON R. ENGLAND, Secretary, Department of
    the Navy,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    HANSFORD T. JOHNSON, Acting Secretary of the
    Navy; RICHARD J. NAUGHTON, Vice Admiral,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA03-900-RDB)

    Submitted:

    March 29, 2006

    Decided:

    April 10, 2006

    Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael P. Nasiatka, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra Deshields Minnis,


    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael P. Nasiatka appeals the district courts order
    granting

    summary

    judgment

    in

    favor

    employment discrimination action.


    find no reversible error.

    of

    his

    employer

    in

    this

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    See Nasiatka v. England, No. CA-03-

    900-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 9, 2003; Mar. 10, 2005).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like