Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Papesh v. American Natl Can Co, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Rudolph S. Papesh v. American National Can Company and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO Local 6660. The district court had granted summary judgment for American National Can Company and dismissed claims against the union while denying other motions. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-11-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-1462

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Rudolph S. Papesh v. American National Can Company and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO Local 6660. The district court had granted summary judgment for American National Can Company and dismissed claims against the union while denying other motions. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Papesh v. American Natl Can Co, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Rudolph S. Papesh v. American National Can Company and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO Local 6660. The district court had granted summary judgment for American National Can Company and dismissed claims against the union while denying other motions. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-1462

    RUDOLPH S. PAPESH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY; UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO LOCAL 6660,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
    (CA-93-523-WMN)
    Submitted:

    September 30, 1997

    Decided:

    November 4, 1997

    Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Rudolph S. Papesh, Appellant Pro Se.
    Maryland, for Appellee.

    Mary T. Keating, Baltimore,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary
    judgment to American National Can Company, dismissing his claims
    against the union, and denying various other motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Papesh v. American Nat'l Can Co., No. CA-93-523-WMN
    (D. Md. Mar. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like