Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Grandison, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition for writ of error coram nobis filed by Anthony Grandison. The district court denied Grandison's petition and the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6851

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition for writ of error coram nobis filed by Anthony Grandison. The district court denied Grandison's petition and the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Grandison, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition for writ of error coram nobis filed by Anthony Grandison. The district court denied Grandison's petition and the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6851

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ANTHONY GRANDISON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Alexander Harvey II, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-79-189-H, CA-97-1359-H)
    Submitted:

    September 25, 1997

    Decided:

    October 21, 1997

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and
    the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
    States v. Grandison, Nos. CR-79-189-H; CA-97-1359-H (D. Md. May 1,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like