Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jackson, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Wendell Anthony Jackson's motion for reduction of sentence. The unpublished opinion found no reversible error in the district court's ruling, which denied Jackson's motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for the reasons stated in its order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-08-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6800

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Wendell Anthony Jackson's motion for reduction of sentence. The unpublished opinion found no reversible error in the district court's ruling, which denied Jackson's motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for the reasons stated in its order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Jackson, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Wendell Anthony Jackson's motion for reduction of sentence. The unpublished opinion found no reversible error in the district court's ruling, which denied Jackson's motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for the reasons stated in its order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6800

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    WENDELL ANTHONY JACKSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
    District Judge. (3:97-cr-00184-13)

    Submitted: August 24, 2006

    Decided: August 31, 2006

    Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wendell Anthony Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,


    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Wendell Anthony Jackson appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under
    18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2000).
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    United States v. Jackson, No.

    3:97-cr-00184-13 (W.D.N.C. filed Apr. 11, 2006 & entered Apr. 12,
    2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like