Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Askew v. Polk, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views3 pages
    Reginald Askew appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Doctor Lightsey. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated, that Askew's § 1983 complaint did not establish a claim for relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-11-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6509

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Reginald Askew appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Doctor Lightsey. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated, that Askew's § 1983 complaint did not establish a claim for relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views3 pages

    Askew v. Polk, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Reginald Askew appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Doctor Lightsey. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated, that Askew's § 1983 complaint did not establish a claim for relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6509

    REGINALD ASKEW,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR LIGHTSEY,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    MARVIN L. POLK; V. MCCULLOUGH;
    NORRIS; D. J. METIKO, Doctor,

    MICHAEL

    V.
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
    District Judge. (5:05-ct-00022-H)

    Submitted:

    September 29, 2006

    Decided:

    November 9, 2006

    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Reginald Askew, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth P. McCullough, YOUNG,


    MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Reginald Askew appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Askew v. Polk,

    No. 5:05-ct-00022-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2006).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like