Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Francis Russell Holley v. Daniel Murray, Principal, Maryland State Penitentiary G.E.D. School, 962 F.2d 6, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Francis Russell Holley appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Holley's appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court provided no oral arguments, as the case facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-05-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 962 F.2d 6 Docket: 92-6073

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Francis Russell Holley appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Holley's appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court provided no oral arguments, as the case facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views1 page

    Francis Russell Holley v. Daniel Murray, Principal, Maryland State Penitentiary G.E.D. School, 962 F.2d 6, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Francis Russell Holley appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Holley's appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court provided no oral arguments, as the case facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    962 F.

    2d 6

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Francis Russell HOLLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Daniel MURRAY, Principal, Maryland State Penitentiary
    G.E.D.
    School, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 92-6073.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 4, 1992
    Decided: May 19, 1992

    Francis Russell Holley, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Francis Russell Holley appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Holley v. Murray, No. CA-91-3396-HAR
    (D. Md. Dec. 5, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like