Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kenneth W. Marsh v. Thomas Keadle, Circuit Judge Joseph Mendez Joseph Wagoner Daniel Fugate State of West Virginia, 962 F.2d 7, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992 regarding Kenneth W. Marsh's appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Marsh's appeal based on the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-05-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 962 F.2d 7 Docket: 92-6171

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992 regarding Kenneth W. Marsh's appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Marsh's appeal based on the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Kenneth W. Marsh v. Thomas Keadle, Circuit Judge Joseph Mendez Joseph Wagoner Daniel Fugate State of West Virginia, 962 F.2d 7, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992 regarding Kenneth W. Marsh's appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Marsh's appeal based on the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    962 F.

    2d 7

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Kenneth W. MARSH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Thomas KEADLE, Circuit Judge; Joseph Mendez; Joseph
    Wagoner; Daniel Fugate; State of West Virginia,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 92-6171.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 4, 1992
    Decided: May 19, 1992

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Kenneth W. Marsh, Appellant Pro Se.
    PER CURIAM:

    Kenneth W. Marsh appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Marsh v. Keadle, No. CA-92-12-E (N.D.W.
    Va. Jan. 28, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like